Finally, this effort is feeling conclusive, which I hoped for from the outset 2+ yrs ago. With the discovery of the socialist emergence from the "Jewish settlements in the Pale," the pure negativity of academic oligarchy the possibility of scientific rehabilitation in an aboriginal context. Cultural "fleshing" will continue with reprints of currently-relevant recently-historical experiences, often gangster, while "the Pale" experience is solidified upto present revolutionary efforts. The hope is to create a hinge with which to restore revolution as evolution after the excessively long period of oligarchic occupation -since 500BC.

Then, probably, the entire blog will be consolidated and "put to rest" with the first wikified writing about the occupy dialectic two years ago.

supporting referenes

Green Flags

The idea of green flags flying in the Russian revolution need to be cited: here "objective" professor Stiles (Georgetown) shows how a multitude of workers experiments blossomed just prior to centralized crackdown: peasants were flying the green flag.

Anti-White, anti-pogrom revolution blossomed during the early stages of the Russian Revolution giving birth to Green... thus our green roots are peasant (from Stiles of Gagetown Univ) that I am hypothesizing were initiated by secular Judaism. In this hypothesis, secular Judaism opened empathic mutualism to civil structures in the ways Christ opened Hillel's ideas to the Greeks and other gentiles such as the Roman centurions that saved him and his father so many times from angry mobs.

This is not religious and filial as both Christians and Hebrews are, but codified into civic law to create socialism (red). In this hypothesis, the Holocaust (white) buried all the knowledge on the behalf of capital (cattle and other livestock) because the Holocaust appears to have been motivated to stop this utopian world love being promoted by Jews either civilly (1920-40s) or through religion (crucifiction). Ultimately, Marx continued the repression from the grave as the Soviet adopted "state capital."

From  Stiles (Georgetown)

Important note about hypotheses 
In the discovery of new material, old material is leveraged, but new material introduces new ideas the push to a higher level because they go beyond the old, supporting material.  

Camatte is important in supporting this because he outright states that there is intellectual contradiction in organization that decays organization into racketeering (his words). 

Included in this contraction is the premise of Labor Green, which is that the educational, oligarchic information structure formed by Socrates and Plato is alive and well and (violently) practicing the socratic method of alternatives as anti-Thesis and synthesis enforced through didactic punishment, and high tuitions.  This is viewed here as codified schizophrenia no different than Diogenes making love to ancient Athens'  marble statues.

Stiles contradiction
Each of the rebellions cited by Stiles is as an independent republic, and is thus a copy of Plato's Republic that is viewed the problem here.  Inserted into each rebellion, according to Stiles, is republican information piece such that it is continually replicated to assure that true liberation never actually happens, just appears to happen, and that oligarchy (including both Hitler, Stalin, and every university, college and elementary school) remain in control.  The problem with Stiles' view is that there was no way that the green-flagged peasants could know who Plato was, what they knew was their own native Earth-bound culture that they could recognize in Kropotkin's work that opposes oligarchy and, thus, the dialectic.

Camatte's contradiction is the basis for work, that organization implodes every time.  In this view, Camatte's contradiction includes Stiles' contradiction, that introjects oligarchy into the green histories of peasantry, where it could not have possibly existed because of the absence of oligarchic, didactic education: they were illiterate.  Further, I, having frequented libraries all my life (esp as a trucker), and having been senior in the US information society, never heard a word about oligarchy until the early 2000s, and only learned about the extent of its introjection into revolution through the treachery of Chris Hedges against my hometown cohort of Aron Kay and John Penley during (the Bolshevik-inspired) Occupy Wall Street occupation.

As important as Camatte is, his contribution is pragmatic and technical, the thinking has to go deeper, rather than farther into the historical of humanity, which is evolutional, and not dialectical --or even philosophical: it is simply green, down to earth, and kind.  It is family and society, not a commune or collectivism.

Gilens and Page fight oligarchy, but fail to mention the dialectic

Martin Gilens' and Benjamin Page's anti-oligarch, pro-democratic writing is good news because, for the first time. oligarchy is represented in opposition to democracy, which, technically, only really applies to the Athenian / Spartan struggle called the Peloponnesian war.  In this war, Socrates sided with oligarchic Sparta, apparently as an expression of freedom in support of Sparta's oligarchic oppression: an obvious contradiction that, today defines libertarianism of industrialists such as the Koch brothers.

Nowhere in Gillen's and Page's writing is mention of the dialectic as the first revival and crystallization of the dialectic.  Contradiction slips to hypocrisy as their work is shown as yet another example of "a copy of the problem introjected into the solution to assure future didactic control via dialectic deception: alternative, synthetic, antithetical cave-bound thoughts based on Socrates and Plato and crystallized by hegelians.

Socrates between democratic Athens and  sided w/ the Athenian enemy, oligarchic Sparta.   In this (hypothetical) view, these terms strictly and only explain the sociological basis of Western Civilization, which has not been a democracy since that time, as Athens won the battles, but lost the war as Socrates and Plato demonstrated the first successful use of information control with the formation of their academy: propaganda at metacognitive levels. It was so successful, it remains in control today, and most likely cannot be dislodged despite the efforts of so many, be they humanistic Jews of the Hebrew empire, constructive Christians of the Russian revolution, or the highly-effective Asian Buddhists of, well, vegetable protein, succumbing to the globalist oligarchy of multiculturalism highly-supported if not synthesized by academia.

So it goes...

If green doesn't know anything about a rrepublic of oligarchy, then what does it know about capital as an extension of cattle before their very faces?  This, probably, will never be known, but possibly be recreated in what we think of in terms of red: socialist land redistribution (in contrast to bolshevik collectivism) that may be detrimental to "white."

No comments:

Post a Comment