Better than meat (in numbers)

I say it funny, "I wouldn't do anything I would not ask someone else to do," so this is not a vegan attempt, but vegetarian in the traditional sense because what makes sense is a reduction in meat rather than the absolute expectation of abstinence that vegans demand.  So, I am not vegan.

Three in ten people smoke, and smoking kills one in three, so 10% of people die from smoking.  But, smoking is not the biggest killer, heart disease is presumably from fast food-type meals.  It is hard to get emergency care sometimes as heart palpitations are given highest priority and heart-disease patients are so common.  Yet patients continue to treat bacon as a vegetable --and laugh about it.

This writing, so far, is not typical of me --I am usually obsessive about rock-solid supporting scientific material so as to create a dependable knowledge base, but, in this case, my personal experiences combined with common knowledge assure beneficial outcomes.  For the moment, bigger questions exist: for instance, "is meat somehow addictive through the "savoury" taste bud called umami?" Also unusual is my use of the Wikipedia, which I edit often, but do not trust.  In the end, I will feel compelled to construct pure, accurate underlying science, so you can probably hold your breath.

Sacrifice is linked to meat, as in animal and human such as in Mezzo-America.  Selling a beloved old car, for instance, to help with child expenses, would be a sacrifice in the sense that I constructed when reading Mumford's Technics and Civilization were humanity and domestic animals evolved together while constructing an empathic model for human evolution in the context of the anborignal/animist emotional relationship with Nature and its animals.  For aborginals, killing animals who live in the nearby woods and are thus something like pets or even friends is highly traumatic; extensive spirituality has been created as therapy to allow aboriginal families and tribes to survive. A second sacrifice type emerges that I experienced in an urban church only recently after ten years of absorbing "country" religion (deliberately) in the aurl/oral tradition.  This sacrifice story was, of course, about Abraham, God, and Abraham's son Issac.  One might extend this to God's own son, Jesus on the cross!  The Issac story was presented in the context of "radical" obedience, which I instantly related to capital control.  Despite various rational and religious treatments, this is about human sacrifice apparently as an extension of animal sacrifice for a "higher-up," the Lord.  It is important to me that I never heard this story from either of my mentors, Pastor George Hart and Major Laverne Fudge, but from a higher-up in a church oligarchy.  Further, both Hart and Fudge are adamant that Christ "liberated" his band of Jews and Gentiles from a ridiculous rule-set found in the older section of the Bible.  This idea can be extended to the infamous human sacrifices of Europe's northern pagans, mass sacrifices being beneficial (and thus altered in definition) for those in control at the expense of the mass of normal, average people.  In terms of cattle, necessary muscle for farming is sacrificed for meat-joys.

A major social issue (for me that is delaying supportive-evidence construction) is the "logos," or logic, of meat.  This is to say that there appears to be a "cattle -> chattle -> capital" continuum that is evident everywhere from accounting to African tribal oligarchy.  What is disturbing (in this context) is the idea of "human capital" especially since which Western academic (Socratic) education is based on it (and probably Asian Confucianism as well).  This is to suggest that the "human object," as Ayn Randian objectivists (through Adam Smith) describe it, is, essentially, meat.  If so, vegetarianism (but not vegan-ism) is liberation from not just oppression, but some form of capital cannibalism that, as far as I can tell, is only described in one place: Cree culture.  (I favour vegetarian over vegan because I see vegans are absolute, and thus vulnerable to criticism as having a "personality disorder" not different from concrete thinking, which is said to lead to bigotry.  I simply want to make humanity more humane while extending each human's life ten to twenty years.  (Supporting links will follow soon.)

Value of a protein source to humans on a simple scale from 0 (low) to 1 Below this table is other nutrient material which has not been linked in such a way as to compare meat with other protein sources, but, presumably from common wisdom, vegetables and seafoods make better sources This index gives value to foods in terms of their protein quality based on both their available amino acids and our ability of us to digest them 1.00 is very high, and 0.50 is moderat

1.00	Soy protein Egg white Milk protein casein whey etc
0.99	Mycoprotein A synthetic protein created through the fermentation of a fungus, Fusarium venenatum.  Eggs and seasoning make it resemble meat; trade secrets often keep the process and ingredients secret.
big gap
0.92	Beef
0.91 - 0.75	Various raw legumes Soy beans Chick peas Black Beans
0.75 - 0.70	Fruits Vegetables
0.59	Cereals Whole wheat other grain derivatives

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_Digestibility_Corrected_Amino_Acid_Score

---

Essential Amino Acids
Proteins that are absolutely necessary for our nutrition that cannot be synthesized from other proteins

Protein	Sources
Histidine (H)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein sesame cheese peanuts
Isoleucine (I)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein fish soy protein (tofu) meat
Leucine (L)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein (tofu) sesame fish cheese
Lysine (K)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein (tofu) cheese fish
Methionine (M)    and Cysteine (C)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein (tofu) sesame fish peanuts mustard seeds
Phenylalanine (F)    and Tyrosine (Y)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein (tofu) sesame fish peanuts cheese
Threonine (T)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein sesame fish
Tryptophan (W)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) sesame winged beans chia seeds
Valine (V)	eggs legumes (pulse: pea, lentil, fava bean) soy protein (tofu) sesame cheese meat

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_amino_acid

---

Other essential nutrients Directly from Wikipedia: Essential_nutrients Fatty acids Essential fatty acids cannot be synthesized by humans, as humans lack the desaturase enzymes required for their production.     α-Linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3), an omega-3 fatty acid     Linoleic acid (LA, 18:2), an omega-6 fatty acid α-Linolenic acid is not used by the body in its original form. It is converted by the body into the required long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6). EPA and DHA can also be consumed from a direct source by consuming fish, fish oil or algal oil (vegetarian source). Linoleic acid is not used by the body in its original form either. It is converted by the body into the required long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids gamma-linolenic acid (GLA, 18:3), dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA, 20:3) and arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4). Omega-9 fatty acids are not essential in humans, because humans generally possess all the enzymes required for their synthesis. Carbohydrates Carbohydrates are sugar molecules and chains of sugar molecules. No individual carbohydrate is an essential nutrient in humans.[4] Glucose can be synthesized from amino acids and glycerol, which is obtained from fat metabolism, by de novo synthesis (called gluconeogenesis), but in insufficient quantities to maintain normal brain metabolism.[citation needed] However, the body can adapt to this state by producing ketones (a state called ketosis) to fuel the brain, which can only use glucose and ketones for fuel, unless carbohydrate stores are repleted. Vitamins A (beta-carotene) B1 (thiamin) B2 (riboflavin, vitamin G) B3 (niacin, vitamin P, vitamin PP) B5 (pantothenic acid) B6 (pyridoxine, pyridoxamine, or pyridoxal) B7 (biotin, vitamin H) B9 (folic acid, folate, vitamin M) B12 (cobalamin) C (ascorbic acid) D (ergocalciferol, or cholecalciferol) E (tocopherol) K (naphthoquinoids) Dietary minerals Calcium (Ca) Chloride (Cl−) Chromium (Cr)[5] Cobalt (Co) (as part of Vitamin B12) Copper (Cu) Main article: Copper in health Iodine (I) Iron (Fe) Magnesium (Mg) Manganese (Mn) Molybdenum (Mo) Phosphorus (P) Potassium (K) Selenium (Se) Sodium (Na) Zinc (Zn) Edit history from WP to credit authors (CC requirement)

Purity of the Proletariat

A revolutionary draft in the tradition of The Proletariat

Camatte, a very good person whose life is metacognitively directed towards endless cycles of synthesis by the classical-modernist influence on revolution who, in the end, finds nature as the real revolutionary goal.  He discovers (and describes) the gangster-tendency devolution of benevolent groups to form into malevolent elitist organizations, especially including the communist parties he belonged to--but ultimately left.  As a true follower of Marx, Camatte approaches a successful return to nature as communism from a modernist revolutionary perspective that resulted in Green Anarchy  --an anarchist syndication.

His communist artifacts are significant.  Perhaps because he left mainstream communism, he is able to show the "short list" of very important communist components that could/should have worked, but didn't because of, as he shows, the corrupting tendency of organizations as they move from a theoretical basis to control strategies necessary for maintaining power.  Without saying so, he reveals Marx and Engels to be anarchist in concept, and their communist theory (along with 1930s German socialist Rosa Luxembourg's) to be strictly self-actualizing as a product of the revolutionary experience, rather than the result of predetermined theoretical dictation.

Very significantly, he shows us "proletariat negation" as a the specific communist extension of the classical dialectic's "negation of negation" (from Hegel).  The proletariat negation is difficult to describe except as a double negative as applied to the absence of something that is desired (and thus a tragic absurdity).  In the "proletariat negation,"  Proletarians seeks full citizenship, which negates their existence as near-slaves, yet, preserves their personal and social proletariat self-identity structure, which they naturally want.  This suggests a communist complication, or contradiction, as the true meaning of the Proletariat changes to meet current expectations of neo-Marxist theory with the Proletariat remaining in a negated state, rather than evolving into a unique culture.

Also significant is the fact that the proletariat negation, or "change in definition," evolved the proletariat into the powerful Soviet military --from near-slavery.  This is "nothing to sneeze at" because Russia had no choice but "Soviet Might" in the face of Nazism, and, subsequently, in fear of America's nuclear-backed capital/corporate expansion during the Cold War: the Bushes (of Yale University), Reagan, and Kissinger.

Taken from the perspective of Occupy critical inquiry, the problem is obviously Hegel (as György Stiffel predicted with his support for the original Occupy critical inquiry hypothesis).  Soviet brutality, as an extension of proletariat negation, is an extension of Hegel's "Negation of Negation."  But, because of the Proletariat's purity in the face of unending capital abuse, the Soviet's military might (with its pioneering space program) is not at fault despite its brutality --only the Hegelians are who consistently misled revolution.  The only negation should be the "negation of the negation of negation," and then negation itself should be negated, forever, with a final, brutal negation of Hegelian synthesists.

Camatte is so helpful when he uses proletarian vocabulary correctly in the context of Marx and Engels.  He shows us how the Proletariat self-negated to near-disappearance because anti-aristocratic revolution was so successful in distributing both wealth (for urban-industrialized) and land (for rural farmers) with the Romanov extermination being an example of communist negation.  He shows us how the communist parties of his time (1960s-70s) had to fight to find proletariat society to represent.  Economies of Camatte's time were much more people-friendly, but the homelessness of the 1980s was just around the corner leading to our current, purely-defined, proletariat population that is often only one paycheck away from homelessness.  Common, non-unionized worker wages have dropped to 1/3 since Camette's time, probably because foreigninzation has successfully pit one culture against another for scant labor wages.  In support of capital, current communists work to provide new proletariat in the Third World for the First World capital machines (through uncontrolled population growth) so that they can subsequently represent and dominate it--precisely as Camette predicts.

From the Occupy critical inquiry's "purist" perspective, the "euro struggle," which is still the problem of negation (as the equivalent of antithesis) is the continuous lie necessary for the metacognitive (current dialectic) to continually transmit (transgenterationally) the sickness of synthesis.  Not mentioned by Camatte as an example of a group that is vulnerable to corruption is "the family."   Both capital and fascism are successfully transmitted through family as corporations (Bush) and police departments (Louima).  "Family" is the way organized crime such as the Mafia self-describes.  Even normal, mainstream families can easily be shown to be dominant and elitist in the ways Camatte describes as they meet his criteria (for racketeering) with their authoritarian attunement of their children to meet synthetic norms such as predetermined human capital and gender roles.

Thus, I see families as the guiltiest of antithesists and elitists; by rejecting and marginalizing youth who do not meet their norms, they create the unstoppable raw revolt of delinquency necessary to precipitate real revolution.  In their suffering, the marginalized youth symbolize the purity of proletariat struggle that attracted the intellectuals and soldiers who ultimately formed the communist movement ultimately resulting in Soviet Might --a gang by any standard.

Notwithstanding Camatte's criticism, the CCCP allowed the Proletariat to redefine itself as a powerful class by de-marginalizing itself to create, for instance, a pioneering space program from its unstoppable military ballistics driven by proletariat revolution.  Perhaps Camatte can momentarily be taken in reverse--but not negated--to implement the current revolution back to nature, which is the return of humanity to the evolutionary track.  Evolution is nothing if not scientific in explaining humanity's faith in nature as nature's own revolution: the evolutionary trajectory of love.  So seducing(!), especially if you consider that priests/pastors (perhaps even Christ) have only been but mere figureheads for the organization of original evolutionary purity: each individual woman's mammalian empathy for her child --her liberation from the capital synthesis of her "real world" family.

References:
Camatte's On Organization (click)
Occupy critical inquiry (Current Dialectic, this blog)

Anti-nazi work-in-progress

Marginalized defectives,  A Nazi bottom line for David Koch, the libertarians, and the Tea Party --and capital civilization as cruelty.

This is a work in progress that attempts to connect related dots that are relevant in our "Western" society as hunters (Lewis Mumford's marginalized defectives).  The KKK and it's Nazi influences are especially relevant  if one hikes in the forests or goes to a Connecticut elementary school.  Assisting an analysis of this dangerous population is new information about the German Freikorps of the 1920s and 30s who defeated the German socialist revolution trough assination, empowered Hitler to come to power, and built the corporate-effecient Auschwitz -- Hoss especially -- where 2000 Jews were killed each day.  Most interesting to this genetic relational mapping (to organismic exploitation) that what we have been hoping for:

A genetic correlation to the Cattle -> chattle -> capital continuum

• A genetic mutation has been linked to cattle as a dietary adaptation to cow's milk that is weaker than weak.  A 
• map has been created from the genetic data which is a globally-scaled map of 
• slavery, including little-known slavery in the Indus (Hindu) River Valley  

Animal sickness
I have long believed that the hunters are the bottom line (as did Lewis Mumford), and without them the oligarchic house of cards would collapse.  Think about it, the US military could go back to the (anti-libertarian) liberation mission of WWII/UN, etc (a perfect world

you know yer a redneck when you fuck a duck and ring its neck --as therapy!

• There is always the "cattle->chattle->capital" continuum to consider, and there is evidence of a genetic alteration, or mutation,  in areas where cattle was "king" linked to digesting cattle's milk (as it claims), not sure if it is about digestion, but it is there where SLAVERY was king! from Jcici Chen -- libertarianism can easily be linked to slavery where human chattle is protected by property protection even when slavery is illegal -- it is new however, WP puts its creation to the Ukraine under early communism where the black flag was invented as a pirate flag w/o skull --WP is also working hard to push industrial anarchy, or anarchist capitalism, as the core anarchy -- things are fitting together, at the core is aspergers, but what we need to do at the social level is link libertarians to Socrates and Plato
  
  Anti-empathy: "if cattle are raised primarily for dairying, calves are generally slaughtered before their first birthday so that their mothers can be milked" from nature.com --PhDs digging around in Plato's cave --farming doesn't work that way, esp. aborignal

  
  
• The milk hypothesis is based on "lactose persistence" genetic alteration in two papers // one says: Genetically programmed down-regulation of the lactase gene is detectable in children from the second year of life, although the onset and extent are SOMEWHAT VARIABLE." 
  

  
  

  Adult-type hypolactasia and regulation of lactase expression

  www.sciencedirect.com

  
  
• I am not certain that there is "proof positive" of genetic "evolution" (or de-evolution as those w/ the mutation have higher heart disease, cancer, biggest killers) but that a hypothesis based on observational outcomes is being supported by related but irrelevant genetic material (one says DNA change is "FAR" from the lactose digestion gene) Plus -- the data is not being made widely available, and the papers cost good money (abstracts are not abstractions but teasers -- these people are wholly dialectical and hegelian), the underlying data may be hidden as is usually the case for politically motivated studies, which the cattle->chattle->capital continuum can ONLY be------------- Links  :http://www.sciencedirect.com/.../pii/S0304416505000346 ---------
• 
  
  

  Other link: http://www.gastrojournal.org/.../S0016-5085(98.../abstract
  

  
  

  The genetically programmed down-regulation of lactase in children

  www.gastrojournal.org
  

  Gastroenterology, Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages 1230-1236, June 1998, Authors:Yangxi Wang; Clare B. Harvey; Edward J. Hollox; Alan D. Phillips; Mark Poulter; Peter Clay; John A. Walker-Smith; Dallas M. Swallow

  
  
• Empiricism (academic science) does not actually provide "proof" (as a functional model (functionally) does by predicting outcomes and providing benefits) but creates statistical likelihoods that usually have low percentages as being "significant" (not a math word) -- My personal observation is that I cannot eat meat because I have not for 2-3 decades, but all my relatives are voracious meat-eaters // using this as a parallel gastronomic example makes me think that cow milk tolerance is being attributed to some irrelevant gene defect (which may be high-functioning-autism necessary for cruelty to animals) // it also makes me wonder if there can be a "reverse" expression back to the DNA by protein signalling (rather than chemical poisoning changing DNA as in cancer)

  
  
• "Lactose map" is also the slavery map, esp in the Hindus' Indus valley (!!!) which supports the cattle-->chattle->capital continuum w/o this argument --but I still think they are full of crap because they won't show data  ---- http://www.nature.com/.../fullsize/lactase-hotspots2.jpg
  

  
  

  

  43 minutes ago · Edited · Like · Remove Preview
• South East Asia is CLEAN, no wonder the libertarians tried to kill it (kissinger-cattle-killer)
  

  

   I wonder if the white areas can be shown to have minimal high-functioning autism.....the real cover up?